Monday, January 18, 2010

Good morning, would you like some sex with your coffee?




Grandparents all over the country are turning their heads in shame. They’re appalled at the blatant displays of sexuality overwhelming every corner of the media. And quite frankly, so am I.

When mass media began to take over, and every living room was equipped with a television or radio, programming was safe for the entire family to enjoy. Shows like Ozzie & Harriet, Lassie, and I Love Lucy, reinforced conservative, family values. Pictures of scantily clad women were reserved for lingerie ads in adult magazines. And dressing like a prostitute usually meant you were one.



But, 60 years later…how things have changed! I am endlessly shocked at the ‘in-your-face’ sexuality of teens and pre-teens today. Even ten years ago, when I was in high school, things were not nearly as bad as the current crisis. First of all, the pregnancy pact…what is that all about?!? As if teenage pregnancy is a “cool” and “socially acceptable” thing to do! And “sexting”- my goodness! I heard a teenage girl on The Tyra Banks Show talk about how she needs to send naked and provocative pictures of herself to boys in order to get any attention. What happened to getting attention by being mysterious or intellectual? Or what happened to waiting until you’re grown and in a committed relationship to start a family? Technology is giving teenagers access to adult material WAY before they’re ready to see it. And television programming geared toward young adults is dripping in sexually-charged content. This is a huge problem, and at the rate we’re going, our grandchildren will be getting their morning pornography before catching the bus to school.

Unfortunately, it is not the media’s fault. It is the fault of the ever-hungry consumer. Media outlets are only trying to market an in-demand product: sex. But it doesn’t make it right. There is a definite line that can be crossed- and it has been. The following are ads for Gossip Girl on CW. In my opinion, the network should be ashamed of the critics’ comments. But instead, they’re using them as a marketing tool.





This is where I draw the line between right and unethical. Instead of giving in to the demands of confused, sexualized teenagers, the modern media should take a cue from the previous generations. I think our grandparents had it right when they let a woman’s appeal come from her home cooking and her innocent smile. And being “sexy” was reserved for the bedroom. It might be too late to rewind to that extent, but something needs to be done. I recommend family-friendly programming on basic cable stations. And shows of a more adult nature can be seen on pay channels or on DVD. Then after the television networks take responsibility for their roles, parents can do the same. At some point we need to take responsibility for our own actions. And just because the media is feeding us sex on a plate, doesn’t mean we need to buy it.

3 comments:

  1. Hi, Haley,

    I think you bring up something really interesting about the balance between the media and the consumer, and who influences who. It's tough to place the blame in anyone direction. Sure, the media feeds off of viewer and reader interest, and shock value is (perhaps unfortunately) a big part of what makes something newsworthy, but I think the burden really falls on the media. It's probably easier to come up with something trendy and explosive, and obviously sex sells, but the way I see it it's the responsibility of any quality media outlet to make sure they're not pandering and pedling crap.

    Also, I saw an ad the other day for a lifetime movie about the Glouchester pregnancy pact. Yikes!

    -Heather

    ReplyDelete
  2. I too think the Gossip Girl ads have gone too far, and follow the too risque ways of our media today. While I think it is right for whoever wants to express themselves to be able to do it however they want (basic freedom of speech), I do think that shows like Gossip Girl and others that are depicting "cool" teenagers drinking, doing drugs and having sex and suffering no consequences sets a bad example for teens, and they should be on later or shown on channels like HBO or FX where the content is notably more adult.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good post, though your personal voice drowns out your external application. Knowing more about who you are and where you're coming from might have helped with this problem, but you certainly want your readers to have some connection to your posts beyond appreciating what you think (particularly if they don't know much about you).

    We'll work on this in class. Keep at it.

    ReplyDelete